Skip to content
CUIRank LogoCUIRank
Ms. Sobia Usman
COMSATS University Lahore • Faculty Profile

Ms. Sobia Usman

Assistant Professor

2.2/ 5.0
Based on 18 reviews
28% Would Retake
Reviews are 100% anonymous • No account required
Checking...

Evaluation Criteria Breakdown

Teaching quality2.1 / 5.0
Grading fairness2.0 / 5.0
Accessibility2.2 / 5.0
Workload2.6 / 5.0

Score Distribution

5 Stars4
4 Stars0
3 Stars1
2 Stars4
1 Star9

Student Feedback & Reviews (18)

Filter Reviews
Absolute nightmare
1.3out of 5
Would Retake
Student Comment

“Honestly, one of the worst teaching experiences. She doesn’t properly explain new concepts; she’ll introduce something like Python and immediately expect us to do it ourselves, while constantly shouting “do this, do that” in the lab. Like, how are we supposed to do it if you don’t teach us first? Her grading is also extremely harsh and often feels unfair in quizzes, assignments, mids, and finals. Very little guidance, lots of unnecessary attitude, and overall just a terrible experience.”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
2.0
SRE
5.0out of 5
Would Retake
Student Comment

“great teacher and person”

Teaching quality
5.0
Grading fairness
5.0
Accessibility
5.0
Workload
5.0
Software Requirement Engineering
5.0out of 5
Would Retake
Student Comment

“Top teacher, Top Sense of humour, Roasts like professional comedian but kind hearted person and grading is fair”

Teaching quality
5.0
Grading fairness
5.0
Accessibility
5.0
Workload
5.0
SRE
5.0out of 5
Would Retake
Student Comment

“great teacher and amazing personality she taught so well”

Teaching quality
5.0
Grading fairness
5.0
Accessibility
5.0
Workload
5.0
Software Requirements Engineering CSE305
5.0out of 5
Would Retake
Student Comment

“Very kind hearted teacher”

Teaching quality
5.0
Grading fairness
5.0
Accessibility
5.0
Workload
5.0
CSC101
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Teaches nothing ,nor she has basic knowledge,marking based on moods even in assignments”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0
CSC101
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Not a good Experience.”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0
Aict lab
2.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Such a nightmare mam was really strict ..stop giving her lecture..bcz she never taught and she expected from us that we already knew everything abt course..she didn't teach but shout very nicely grading was also biased such a ajeeeeeb tchr nvr saw a tchr like her”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
5.0
ICT lab
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“I really pray we don't have to deal with that teacher again....she was so mean and used to scare us for no reason....Her class was absolute torture "On top of that...her favoritism was unbearable!" her behaviour was just pure mental torture”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0
AICT Lab
1.8out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“She had an awful behavior as a teacher. She would scold students for asking questions. She was supposed to teach us Python but expected us to know all the lectures beforehand.The gradings were biased. She was never satisfied with anyone's work. Runnnn!!! If you see her as your lecturer.”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
2.0
Workload
3.0
AICT LAB
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“It was purely based on grading of her own choice”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0
Ict Lab
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Worst teacher, worst attitude and Poor Grading”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0
Ict lab
2.5out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Personally i respect the teacher but some issues that my class faced were that she didn't teach much just gave basic overview and told students to do all the work by themselves , that too in the same lab. Other than that many students did not ask questions because she'd scold them on asking "such basic" or "childish" questions But the course was not hard, you could easily get a 4. Grading was okay.”

Teaching quality
3.0
Grading fairness
3.0
Accessibility
2.0
Workload
2.0
ICT
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“absolute nightmare. unapproachable. unfair. horrible experience. Have mercy on the students and stop giving her any classes”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0
ICT LAB
1.3out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“A respected teacher but teaching skills should be improved. she gives instruction very quickly without explaining the key concept enough and expects student to know things already . Encouragement and attention should be distributed among all students equally. One more thing, she panics alot specially during lab exams.”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
2.0
Aict lab
2.3out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Mam's grading scheme is totally unfair. Teaching quality is also not good. She has no much knowledge about programming.”

Teaching quality
2.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
3.0
Workload
3.0
ICT lab
1.3out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Overly criticizes and never explains a thing. Never gives marks in assignment, mid and final term which a students deserves from there paper”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
2.0
Aict lab
1.8out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“It was an awful experience”

Teaching quality
2.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
2.0
Workload
2.0