Skip to content
CUIRank LogoCUIRank
COMSATS University Abbottabad • Faculty Profile

Dr. Ahmed Saeed Khattak

Senior Engineer

1.6/ 5.0
Based on 6 reviews
0% Would Retake
Reviews are 100% anonymous • No account required
Checking...

Evaluation Criteria Breakdown

Teaching quality1.2 / 5.0
Grading fairness1.0 / 5.0
Accessibility2.2 / 5.0
Workload2.2 / 5.0

Score Distribution

5 Stars0
4 Stars0
3 Stars0
2 Stars4
1 Star2

Student Feedback & Reviews (6)

Filter Reviews
Ai,coal,ica,automata
2.3out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Just drop the course”

Teaching quality
2.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
5.0
Workload
1.0
Discrete Structures
2.3out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“He doesn’t know how to teach plus the paper he makes is totally opposite of what he teaches as a result we don’t know how to attempt the paper and won’t get marks either. In this sense he is fair in marking.. like Jo likha hi nai ha usky marks b nai mily.”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
3.0
Workload
4.0
Discrete structures
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Worst teacher ever it would not take any subject again from this”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0
Discrete Structure
1.8out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“I would like to express my dissatisfaction with my teaching experience in this subject, which has been one of the worst experiences. The main concern was that the instructor appeared to have been assigned a subject that was not within his area of specialization. As a result, many students struggled to understand the lectures, and, not even a single student was able to properly grasp the concepts being taught.we approached the Head of Department (HOD) and requested a change of instructor. However, we were informed that there was not enough faculty available to make this change. Furthermore, the amount of teaching and guidance provided during class was insufficient, while the examination was significantly more difficult than what would reasonably be expected from second-semester students based on the material covered in class I believe the department should seriously investigate why a subject was assigned to an instructor whose expertise does not appear to align with it in first place ..”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
4.0
Artificial Intelligence
1.5out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Teaching method was not good at all also very unfair grading”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
2.0
Workload
2.0
Artificial intelligence
1.0out of 5
Would Not Retake
Student Comment

“Worst teacher ever Bez of it's worst teaching methods and style”

Teaching quality
1.0
Grading fairness
1.0
Accessibility
1.0
Workload
1.0